Are We Seeing The Start Of The AI Pullback?
What Is AI Pullback?
In these last few years, we’ve all heard nothing but the revolutionary and transformative influence of Artificial Intelligence not only in the mainstream consciousness but also in various industries. A mixture of excitement and anxiety, we’ve collectively marveled at what Generative AI could produce or emulate in little to no time at all while grasping at the notion of what all this automation means for the human workforce and talent. However, the tone appears to be shifting these past few months with data showing large companies’ adoption of AI on the decline.
As reported in Apollo, a biweekly US Census Bureau survey of 1.2 million firms revealed a downward trend in AI utilization for companies with more than 250 employees. Falling from about 13.5% in June to under 12% in August, it’s the largest decline for AI adoption since the survey started in November 2023. Mid-sized companies or firms with less than 250 employees but more than 19 workers showed decreasing or stagnating AI adoption. It’s only with small companies with less than four employees that demonstrated a slight increase in AI usage.
New reports might help shed light on the AI pullback, such as a recent one from MIT indicating that 95% of AI pilot programs failed to boost company revenues or productivity. MIT’s findings were based on reviews of over 300 public corporate AI usage, surveying 350 employees, and talking with 150 industry leaders.
A recent study by METR revealed that developers surprisingly took 19% longer to complete issues when using AI coding tools than without. Yet despite actually experiencing slowdown, the developers still believed AI sped them up by 20%. This gap between developers’ perception and reality is representative of these past few years with the hyped up implementation of AI into everything software-related and unrestrained confidence in the hot new tech in spite of the unfavorable results.
IT Consultancy Gartner also attempted to quantify how much work AI agents get wrong when it “hallucinates.” They found that generative AI performs office tasks wrong a staggering 70% of the time. With that much error, human oversight becomes a necessity and in some cases, objectives would’ve been served much better had the task been assigned to a person instead of a machine.
Image: Mathias Reding
Is AI Pullback A Sign Of AI Adoption Maturity?
On a different note, the MTLC wrote that the AI pullback might seem like a slowdown but it could actually be a correction or calibration, as is the natural progression with any emerging tech’s usage. They pointed out that the same MIT report accounted for over 90% of employees using AI tools, no matter the company stance with AI. That these workers would utilize AI just so they can perform their tasks more efficiently and faster. And that this is another way at looking at AI adoption- “bottom-up, not just top down.”
It’s not that AI isn’t viable, but rather “the projects weren’t scoped, aligned, or designed for outcomes.” 95% of AI projects fail not because of the technology but because of how companies approach AI adoption.
AI pullback is signaling the transition from overenthusiasm to realistic expectations, from experimentation to production. For enterprise businesses to succeed with AI, they would need to identify which models, tools and processes work, which projects to invest in, and where AI would deliver the most value.
Image: Andrea Piacquadio
Cascade Strategies’ Approach To AI
The promise of increased production and revenue had led to companies to replace or cease hiring human workers in favor of AI during the onset of its mainstream popularity. Now that AI pullback is happening, companies have begun hiring human workers again not only to oversee but fix or improve sloppy AI outputs.
Nimbus Online has always approached AI not just merely as a tool but as an augmentation and extension of human intelligence and talent. Yes, AI is a very powerful and promising technology but we recognize early on that on its own, it is gravely limited to the datasets its fed and their quality, the eventual gaps providing the perfect breeding ground for “hallucinations,” each iteration degrading and becoming less of what was before. We’ve always seen human intervention and guidance as essential for AI to maximize its potential; with the AI pullback, more and more companies are on the brink of discovering this incredible synergy between human and artificial intelligence.
Powered by AI, research becomes scalable and cost-effective by being applicable in all facets of the business and not just flagship projects; human oversight amplifies all that productivity and efficiency by unlocking innovative, resonant and actionable insights.
If you would like to learn more about how our human-centered market research work can benefit you or your company, feel free to contact us here.
Image: cottonbro studio
Additional Reading:
AI Pullback Has Officially Started – Will Lockett, medium.com Oct. 22, 2025
Data Shows That AI Use Is Now Declining at Large Companies – Joe Wilkins, futurism.com Sep. 8, 2025
AI adoption slows among big firms, U.S. data shows – Jullianna Anne Briones, tech.co Sep. 18, 2025
US Census Bureau: AI Adoption Has Declined for Large Companies – Conor Cawley, Sep. 11, 2025
AI adoption rate is declining among large companies — US Census Bureau claims fewer businesses are using AI tools – Hassam Nasir, tomshardware.com Sep. 8, 2025